Welcome!

Weblogic Authors: Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Michael Meiner, Michael Bushong, Avi Rosenthal

Related Topics: Silverlight, Microsoft Cloud

Silverlight: Article

Identify Performance Bottlenecks in Your BizTalk Environment - Part 3

Orchestration and calling external services

In my last two articles I wrote about how to Use BizTalk Performance Counters and how to Analyze Adapter and Pipeline Performance. In this final article I focus on Orchestration and calling external services.

Step 4: Analyzing Orchestration
Orchestrations can be as simple as reading a file from a file system, transforming it and writing it out to a different file. They can also be much more complex such as calling external web services depending on certain conditions in the incoming messages, taking the response of these services and calling other services or writing a transformed version of the response to a file or the database. The following screenshot shows a rather simple Orchestration taken from one of the examples that ships with BizTalk:

Orchestration Example showing a message flow including a call to  an external service

Orchestration Example showing a message flow including a call to an external service

The process starts by receiving a file from the receiving port ReceivePO. The message then gets transformed using a mapping definition that maps individual fields from the original message to the destination message. The following screenshot shows such a mapping definition:

Business Mapping for Message Transformation

Business Mapping for Message Transformation

The Orchestration goes on by sending a message to port POWebServicePort. The response of this Web Service call is transformed again using another mapping definition. The final transformed message is then sent to the SendInvoicePort which in my case means writing it to the file system.

What about performance?
In BizTalk message processing there are different components involved. We already learned how to analyze Adapters and Pipelines in my previous blog entry and what we can do there to analyze whether these components have a negative impact on message processing performance.

The actual logic behind the Orchestration Definition is compiled into an assembly, loaded into BizTalk, and gets executed when messages are processed by that Orchestration Definition. Here is a sample PurePath that shows the execution of compiled orchestration code:

PurePath of Orchestration Logic Execution

PurePath of Orchestration Logic Execution

What can we observe here?
Applying the Transformation takes 444ms in this scenario
The SendMessage method puts the transformed message back into the MessageBox on SQL Server. The actual interaction with the MessageBox happens in the Commit method which takes 541ms in this scenario.

I ran some more load against my BizTalk environment analyzing all the PurePath’s that trace the logic of my orchestration. With increasing load the bottleneck in my environment clearly is the MessageBox, indicated by the Commit method that takes up to 99% of the transaction execution time.

Commit taking 99% of execution time with huge transaction time  variance

Commit taking 99% of execution time with huge transaction time variance

Not only is Commit taking 99% of the time for the slowest transaction, it also has a huge variance in execution time – meaning, it doesn’t scale in my environment. If you look at the PurePath duration in the screenshot above we see execution times ranging from 1.1 to 6.9 seconds. Analyzing the methods that were executed in these transactions gives me the following information:

Non Scaling Methods in my BizTalk Environment

Non Scaling Methods in my BizTalk Environment

I added min and max execution time of the methods involved in these transactions. Not surprisingly do we see a huge range from several milliseconds to 6.9 seconds for the Commit method. The execute method on top is a transaction I haven’t yet shown you. It is thread that pulls out information from the MessageBox to further process the message.

Problem: In my scenario the MessageBox is clearly my bottleneck in my environment. Putting messages into the box and getting them out again doesn’t scale with the load I want to put on it.

What about performance counters?

Performance counters are always a great source of information. BizTalk provides a set of counters for the Orchestration Engine as well as for the MessageBox. Check out the two previous links for a description on these counters.

HINT: BizTalk MessageBox Viewer Tool

Jean-Pierre Auconie is the creator of the BizTalk MessageBox Viewer. Check out his blog and the download site for this tool. This tool runs a set of tests and queries against the MessageBox database. The results will be displayed in the tool and can also be exported as HTML reports including links. The following screenshot shows the output in the tool on my installation:

Analysis Output in BizTalk MessageBox Viewer Tool

Analysis Output in BizTalk MessageBox Viewer Tool

The tool gives an overview of what might be wrong in your installation. In my case it seems that I ran into a “classical” BizTalk MessageBox issue: My Sql Agent Jobs don’t run on my machine to clear up the database. Also check out this MSDN forum thread that talks about the same scenario somebody else ran into.

Step 5: Analyzing External Service Calls (SendPorts)
The last thing I want to show you is when my BizTalk Orchestration makes a call to the external Web Service. The following image shows a PurePath that shows the Orchestration engine making the call to the web service. The PurePath shows the web service client proxy as well as the execution of the web service on the server that implements the web service:

Distributed PurePath showing a Web Service call from BizTalk to  the Web Service implementation

Distributed PurePath showing a Web Service call from BizTalk to the Web Service implementation

The 2nd call in this trace is the call to the generated web service proxy within my BizTalk Host Instance. The web service is executed synchronously in the ASPX implementation hosted in IIS. The interesting thing here is that I have huge execution differences of this web service call. The method that varies greatly in execution time is the client side call to the proxy that is doing all the marshalling of data.

Final Words
This is the final article in my series on BizTalk. The key take away is to make sure you monitor your BizTalk performance counters. Use the BizTalk MessageBox Viewer to run checks against your individual MessageBox databases. In case you are interested in in-depth tracing of messages through BizTalk using dynaTrace you should check out Managing BizTalk Performance and The Business Process It Automates, our Community Downloads to get access to the BizTalk Fast Pack (registered users only), and a White Paper I wrote about Performance Management in Enterprise .NET Systems.

Related reading:

  1. Identify Performance Bottlenecks in your BizTalk Environment – Part I Microsoft BizTalk enables companies to integrate and automate their business...
  2. Identify Performance Bottlenecks in your BizTalk Environment – Part II In Part I of this blog series I gave a...
  3. Performance Analysis: Identify GC bottlenecks in distributed heterogeneous environments Garbage Collection can have a major impact on application performance....
  4. Performance Analysis: How to identify synchronization issues under load? Synchronization is a necessary mechanism to control access to shared...
  5. Performance Analysis: How to identify “bad” methods messing up the GC Whenever the Garbage Collector kicks in to free up memory...

More Stories By Andreas Grabner

Andreas Grabner has been helping companies improve their application performance for 15+ years. He is a regular contributor within Web Performance and DevOps communities and a prolific speaker at user groups and conferences around the world. Reach him at @grabnerandi

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
Digital Transformation and Disruption, Amazon Style - What You Can Learn. Chris Kocher is a co-founder of Grey Heron, a management and strategic marketing consulting firm. He has 25+ years in both strategic and hands-on operating experience helping executives and investors build revenues and shareholder value. He has consulted with over 130 companies on innovating with new business models, product strategies and monetization. Chris has held management positions at HP and Symantec in addition to ...
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
The challenges of aggregating data from consumer-oriented devices, such as wearable technologies and smart thermostats, are fairly well-understood. However, there are a new set of challenges for IoT devices that generate megabytes or gigabytes of data per second. Certainly, the infrastructure will have to change, as those volumes of data will likely overwhelm the available bandwidth for aggregating the data into a central repository. Ochandarena discusses a whole new way to think about your next...
CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO are the world's most influential, independent events where Cloud Computing was coined and where technology buyers and vendors meet to experience and discuss the big picture of Digital Transformation and all of the strategies, tactics, and tools they need to realize their goals. Sponsors of DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO benefit from unmatched branding, profile building and lead generation opportunities.
All in Mobile is a place where we continually maximize their impact by fostering understanding, empathy, insights, creativity and joy. They believe that a truly useful and desirable mobile app doesn't need the brightest idea or the most advanced technology. A great product begins with understanding people. It's easy to think that customers will love your app, but can you justify it? They make sure your final app is something that users truly want and need. The only way to do this is by ...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Big Data Federation to Exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO, November 12-13, 2018 in New York City. Big Data Federation, Inc. develops and applies artificial intelligence to predict financial and economic events that matter. The company uncovers patterns and precise drivers of performance and outcomes with the aid of machine-learning algorithms, big data, and fundamental analysis. Their products are deployed...
Cell networks have the advantage of long-range communications, reaching an estimated 90% of the world. But cell networks such as 2G, 3G and LTE consume lots of power and were designed for connecting people. They are not optimized for low- or battery-powered devices or for IoT applications with infrequently transmitted data. Cell IoT modules that support narrow-band IoT and 4G cell networks will enable cell connectivity, device management, and app enablement for low-power wide-area network IoT. B...
The hierarchical architecture that distributes "compute" within the network specially at the edge can enable new services by harnessing emerging technologies. But Edge-Compute comes at increased cost that needs to be managed and potentially augmented by creative architecture solutions as there will always a catching-up with the capacity demands. Processing power in smartphones has enhanced YoY and there is increasingly spare compute capacity that can be potentially pooled. Uber has successfully ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that CrowdReviews.com has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5–7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. CrowdReviews.com is a transparent online platform for determining which products and services are the best based on the opinion of the crowd. The crowd consists of Internet users that have experienced products and services first-hand and have an interest in letting other potential buye...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...