Welcome!

Weblogic Authors: Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Michael Meiner, Michael Bushong, Avi Rosenthal

Related Topics: Java IoT, IBM Cloud, Weblogic

Java IoT: Article

Java Developer's Journal Feature: "Deadlocks in J2EE"

Most non-trivial applications involve high degrees of concurrency and many layers of abstraction

In the example, the updateBatchStatus method makes a "RequiresNew" EJB call to actually update the batch_status database table so the status change is immediately visible, even though the effects of the current transaction aren't yet visible. The call to executeUpdate isn't an EJB call, so it executes in the same transaction as the rest of bulkLoadData.

As described, this code will cause a deadlock even in the absence of concurrency. When bulkLoadData calls the executeUpdate method, it updates an existing database row, which involves acquiring a write-lock on that row. The nested EJB call to updateBatchStatus will execute on a separate database connection and try to execute a very similar query, but it will block because it can't acquire the necessary write-lock. From the database's perspective, this second connection will be allowed to proceed as soon as the first connection's transaction is committed or rolled back, which is why the database doesn't detect this as a deadlock. The VM, however, won't allow the call to bulkLoadData to complete before each call to updateBatchStatus completes, so we have a deadlock.

This example shows one update blocking another update, so it causes a deadlock on any database. If the initial update query was a simple select query instead, this example would only cause deadlocks on databases that use lock-based concurrency control, where one connection's read-lock can block another connection from acquiring a write-lock. In any case, a deadlock of this type is neither timing-dependent nor load-dependent, and the thread dump will show one Java thread waiting for a database response, but that thread will be associated with two active database connections. And one of those database connections will be idle, but blocking the other connection.

This scenario has many subtle variations, where more than one thread and more than two database connections may be involved. For example, the outer EJB call's database connection may have acquired a database lock that blocks another unrelated database connection from proceeding, but that unrelated database connection has acquired a lock that blocks the nested EJB call's database operation. This particular case is timing-dependent, and will show several Java threads waiting for database responses. At least one of those Java threads will be associated with two active database connections.

Cross-Resource Deadlock #3: JVM Locks Crossed with Database Locks
A third deadlock scenario occurs when mixing database locks with JVM locks. In this case, one thread holds a database lock and is trying to acquire a JVM lock (trying to enter a synchronized block), and another thread holds that JVM lock and is trying to acquire a database lock. Again, the database sees one connection blocking another, but nothing is stopping that connection from proceeding, so it won't detect a deadlock. The JVM sees one thread inside a synchronized block and another trying to enter, so even if the JVM could detect deadlocks and handle them somehow, it wouldn't detect this case.

For an example that illustrates this deadlock scenario, consider a simple (flawed) read-through cache. This cache is a HashMap backed by a database table. If a cache hit occurs, it will simply return the value from the HashMap; on a cache miss however, it will read the value from the database, add it to the HashMap, and return it as shown in Listing 2.

It's a simple read-through cache. Note that the get() method is synchronized, since we access a non-thread safe container, and we want the containsKey/put combination to be atomic in the case of a cache miss.

This cache is fairly straightforward: the contract is that if we change the data in the table backing the cache, we should call clearCache(), so the cache can avoid handing back stale data. The resulting cache misses will repopulate the cache appropriately.

Let's now consider some code that changes this data and clears the cache:

public void updateData(String key, String value) {
    executeUpdate("update cache_table set value='" + value +
       "' where key='" + key + "'");
    SimpleCache.getInstance().clearCache();
}

In a simple case, this will work with no problems. However, on a database that uses lock-based concurrency control, the query in updateData will prevent the select query in queryForValue from executing, because the update statement will have acquired a write-lock that prevents the select query from acquiring a read-lock on the same row. If the timing is just right, one thread can try to read a given value out of the cache and get a cache miss while another thread updates that value in the database. If the database executes the update statement first, it will block the select statement from continuing. However, the thread executing the select statement came through the synchronized get method, so it has acquired the lock on the SimpleCache. For the thread in updateData to return, it has to call clearCache(), but it can't acquire the lock (clearCache() is synchronized).

When dealing with an instance of this scenario, there will be one Java thread waiting for a response from the database, and one waiting to acquire a JVM lock. Each thread will be associated with a database connection, with one connection blocking the other. The fix is to avoid doing database operations while holding JVM locks: the get() method of our SimpleCache could be rewritten like this:

public Object get(String key) {
    synchronized(this) {
       if (cache.containsKey(key)) {
          return cache.get(key);
       }
    }
    Object value = queryForValue(key);
    synchronized(this) {
       cache.put(key, value);
    }
    return value;
}

Since we now know that this deadlock case can happen, we can add a check to our queryForValue method to try to avoid the deadlock condition by using Thread.holdsLock():

private Object queryForValue(String key) {
      assert(!Thread.holdsLock(this));
      return executeQuery(...);
}

While Thread.holdsLock() can be useful in this case, it only works if we know which locks we're specifically worried about. It would be useful to have a similar method that could determine whether the current thread holds any JVM locks. Then, any piece of code that made any kind of RPC call, database access, etc., could throw an exception or log a warning to indicate that these operations can be dangerous while holding a JVM lock.

Note: even though we've fixed the deadlock problem in this example, it's still flawed because the cache is cleared before updateData's transaction has been committed. If a cache miss happens after the clearCache call but before updateData's transaction is committed, the cache will load the old data because the new data isn't visible yet. The fix here is to clear the cache only after the changes have been committed. Observe that this would only happen in an MVCC database; in a lock-based database, the pending update would block the cache's read, so the cache would read the correct value after the update's transaction was committed.

Rules of Thumb
These guidelines should help you avoid these problems, or at least diagnose and fix them if they do happen.

  • Keep your transactions short and simple.
  • Understand the locking behavior of your database (and your transaction isolation level).
  • Assume any database access has a chance of failing with a database deadlock, and retry correctly.
  • Don't update any non-transactional state (in-memory state, caches, etc.) until after the transaction has completed.
  • Make sure resource pools are large enough for your peak concurrency.
  • Try not to acquire multiple resources at the same time. If you must, acquire them in the same order each time.
  • Learn how to get a full thread dump from your application server and a list of database connections from your database (including which connections are blocked by each), and how to know which Java thread each active database connection is associated with. The easiest way to understand the mapping between Java threads and database connections is to add some logging to your connection pool access code.
  • When making nested EJB calls, understand which ones will use the same database connection as the caller, and which ones will use new connections. Even if the nested call runs in the same global transaction, it may still use a different database connection, and this can cause cross-resource deadlocks.
  • Avoid making database calls and EJB calls, or doing other off-JVM operations while holding JVM locks. Use assert(!Thread.holdsLock(...)) if there are specific JVM locks you're concerned about to prevent future code changes from violating this rule unintentionally.
Conclusion
Cross-resource deadlocks in a J2EE application can be a big problem - they can cause the entire application to grind to a halt. They can also be difficult to isolate and fix, especially if developers aren't familiar with how to analyze a deadlocked environment. The scenarios we've discussed should help you understand a few common deadlocks, and give you some idea of what to look for. Even better, the rules of thumb we've outlined should give you a few conventions to follow in your code to avoid problems like this altogether.

Resources

More Stories By Michael Nonemacher

Michael Nonemacher is a lead software engineer for Lombardi Software. He has worked with Java since 1997, focusing on server-side database interaction and concurrency in Web-based enterprise applications.

Comments (3) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
debnathm 11/18/08 11:48:20 AM EST

You mention:
"It would be nice if the EJB vendors supplied a retry-on-deadlock parameter that would do this automatically with container-managed transactions. Without this automated feature, developers end up forcing EJB calls to use bean-managed transactions just to be able to retry on deadlocks. (One of the disadvantages to making your EJB calls use bean-managed transactions is that it's not obvious how to get the same semantics as a container-managed transaction with "RequiresNew" ...)"

Is BMT strictly required to retry? Suppose all business methods pass through an initial method with no transaction attributes. This method front_bizmethod() calls the actual business method which of course
has a transaction attribute of Required/RequiresNew etc.

public void front_bizmethod()
{
int retry_count = 0;
boolean retry = false;
do
{
try
{
bizmethod();
}
catch (RetryException re)
{
retry = true;
retry_count++;
}
} while (retry && retry_count < 10);
}

/** Business method -- has transaction attribute
* Required or RequiresNew
*/
bizmethod() throws RetryException
{
// Do business calls and throw a RetryException
// if a deadlock was detected by the database
}

What I mean is that there is a way around it by
coding an extra method.

What are your thoughts on the same ?

jnorris10 07/08/06 11:10:54 PM EDT

Thanks for this great article, Mike. I wasn't able to make it to JavaOne this year so I missed your BOF at JavaOne that looks like it was talking about this stuff (BOF-0534). Are there any slides from that that I can get ahold of?

With the power and simplicity that CMT (container managed transactions) brings, is there really no simple way to automatically handle database deadlock by retrying the transaction according to some given parameters (ie: number of retries, back off time, etc)? That would really be unfortunate.

Here are a few possible solutions, but they all seem sub-optimal for various reasons: (I would like to stay within the spec (EJB3/JEE5), but I'm not adament on this).

1) JBoss has a proprietary extension for this: (org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxRetryExceptionHandler) However, besides being outside the spec, this implementation does not allow me to easily keep track of any state regarding the retry (ie: retry count numbers, data for back off algorithms, etc.).

2) I can use the EJB3 Interceptor spec, but this is really cumbersome because it ties in *after* the CMT stuff has already been setup.

3) I'm sure I could write a jboss-aop interceptor that would do the right thing here, but again it would be outside the spec. Has anyone done this already? I certainly don't want to reinvent the wheel on this one.

4) I could switch from CMT (container managed transactions) to BMT (bean managed transactions). This would give me more control over the the transaction endpoints but then I would have to give up all the niceties that CMT give me.

I really would like a nice solution for this...

SYS-CON Australia News Desk 04/11/06 10:14:26 AM EDT

Most non-trivial applications involve high degrees of concurrency and many layers of abstraction. Concurrency is associated with resource contention and an increase in deadlock conditions. The multiple layers of abstraction make it more difficult to isolate and fix the deadlock conditions.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settlement products to hedge funds and investment banks. After, he co-founded a revenue cycle management company where he learned about Bitcoin and eventually Ethereal. Andrew's role at ConsenSys Enterprise is a mul...
Amazon started as an online bookseller 20 years ago. Since then, it has evolved into a technology juggernaut that has disrupted multiple markets and industries and touches many aspects of our lives. It is a relentless technology and business model innovator driving disruption throughout numerous ecosystems. Amazon’s AWS revenues alone are approaching $16B a year making it one of the largest IT companies in the world. With dominant offerings in Cloud, IoT, eCommerce, Big Data, AI, Digital Assista...
The Founder of NostaLab and a member of the Google Health Advisory Board, John is a unique combination of strategic thinker, marketer and entrepreneur. His career was built on the "science of advertising" combining strategy, creativity and marketing for industry-leading results. Combined with his ability to communicate complicated scientific concepts in a way that consumers and scientists alike can appreciate, John is a sought-after speaker for conferences on the forefront of healthcare science,...
In his session at Cloud Expo, Alan Winters, U.S. Head of Business Development at MobiDev, presented a success story of an entrepreneur who has both suffered through and benefited from offshore development across multiple businesses: The smart choice, or how to select the right offshore development partner Warning signs, or how to minimize chances of making the wrong choice Collaboration, or how to establish the most effective work processes Budget control, or how to maximize project result...
In his keynote at 19th Cloud Expo, Sheng Liang, co-founder and CEO of Rancher Labs, discussed the technological advances and new business opportunities created by the rapid adoption of containers. With the success of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and various open source technologies used to build private clouds, cloud computing has become an essential component of IT strategy. However, users continue to face challenges in implementing clouds, as older technologies evolve and newer ones like Docker c...
When shopping for a new data processing platform for IoT solutions, many development teams want to be able to test-drive options before making a choice. Yet when evaluating an IoT solution, it’s simply not feasible to do so at scale with physical devices. Building a sensor simulator is the next best choice; however, generating a realistic simulation at very high TPS with ease of configurability is a formidable challenge. When dealing with multiple application or transport protocols, you would be...
Data is the fuel that drives the machine learning algorithmic engines and ultimately provides the business value. In his session at Cloud Expo, Ed Featherston, a director and senior enterprise architect at Collaborative Consulting, discussed the key considerations around quality, volume, timeliness, and pedigree that must be dealt with in order to properly fuel that engine.
Personalization has long been the holy grail of marketing. Simply stated, communicate the most relevant offer to the right person and you will increase sales. To achieve this, you must understand the individual. Consequently, digital marketers developed many ways to gather and leverage customer information to deliver targeted experiences. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Lou Casal, Founder and Principal Consultant at Practicala, discussed how the Internet of Things (IoT) has accelerated our abilit...
Dion Hinchcliffe is an internationally recognized digital expert, bestselling book author, frequent keynote speaker, analyst, futurist, and transformation expert based in Washington, DC. He is currently Chief Strategy Officer at the industry-leading digital strategy and online community solutions firm, 7Summits.
Two weeks ago (November 3-5), I attended the Cloud Expo Silicon Valley as a speaker, where I presented on the security and privacy due diligence requirements for cloud solutions. Cloud security is a topical issue for every CIO, CISO, and technology buyer. Decision-makers are always looking for insights on how to mitigate the security risks of implementing and using cloud solutions. Based on the presentation topics covered at the conference, as well as the general discussions heard between sessio...
Detecting internal user threats in the Big Data eco-system is challenging and cumbersome. Many organizations monitor internal usage of the Big Data eco-system using a set of alerts. This is not a scalable process given the increase in the number of alerts with the accelerating growth in data volume and user base. Organizations are increasingly leveraging machine learning to monitor only those data elements that are sensitive and critical, autonomously establish monitoring policies, and to detect...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Arvind Radhakrishnen discussed how IoT offers new business models in banking and financial services organizations with the capability to revolutionize products, payments, channels, business processes and asset management built on strong architectural foundation. The following topics were covered: How IoT stands to impact various business parameters including customer experience, cost and risk management within BFS organizations.
Recently, REAN Cloud built a digital concierge for a North Carolina hospital that had observed that most patient call button questions were repetitive. In addition, the paper-based process used to measure patient health metrics was laborious, not in real-time and sometimes error-prone. In their session at 21st Cloud Expo, Sean Finnerty, Executive Director, Practice Lead, Health Care & Life Science at REAN Cloud, and Dr. S.P.T. Krishnan, Principal Architect at REAN Cloud, discussed how they built...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settl...
IoT solutions exploit operational data generated by Internet-connected smart “things” for the purpose of gaining operational insight and producing “better outcomes” (for example, create new business models, eliminate unscheduled maintenance, etc.). The explosive proliferation of IoT solutions will result in an exponential growth in the volume of IoT data, precipitating significant Information Governance issues: who owns the IoT data, what are the rights/duties of IoT solutions adopters towards t...
With tough new regulations coming to Europe on data privacy in May 2018, Calligo will explain why in reality the effect is global and transforms how you consider critical data. EU GDPR fundamentally rewrites the rules for cloud, Big Data and IoT. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Adam Ryan, Vice President and General Manager EMEA at Calligo, examined the regulations and provided insight on how it affects technology, challenges the established rules and will usher in new levels of diligence arou...
Organizations planning enterprise data center consolidation and modernization projects are faced with a challenging, costly reality. Requirements to deploy modern, cloud-native applications simultaneously with traditional client/server applications are almost impossible to achieve with hardware-centric enterprise infrastructure. Compute and network infrastructure are fast moving down a software-defined path, but storage has been a laggard. Until now.
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that All in Mobile, a mobile app development company from Poland, will exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO. All In Mobile is a mobile app development company from Poland. Since 2014, they maintain passion for developing mobile applications for enterprises and startups worldwide.
Digital Transformation is much more than a buzzword. The radical shift to digital mechanisms for almost every process is evident across all industries and verticals. This is often especially true in financial services, where the legacy environment is many times unable to keep up with the rapidly shifting demands of the consumer. The constant pressure to provide complete, omnichannel delivery of customer-facing solutions to meet both regulatory and customer demands is putting enormous pressure on...
The best way to leverage your CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO presence as a sponsor and exhibitor is to plan your news announcements around our events. The press covering CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO will have access to these releases and will amplify your news announcements. More than two dozen Cloud companies either set deals at our shows or have announced their mergers and acquisitions at CloudEXPO. Product announcements during our show provide your company with the most reach through our targeted audienc...