Welcome!

Weblogic Authors: Michael Bushong, Avi Rosenthal

News Feed Item

Software - BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) Industry Guide

NEW YORK, Jan. 14, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

Software - BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) Industry Guide

http://www.reportlinker.com/p0191844/Software---BRIC-Brazil-Russia-India...

Software - BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) Industry Guide is an essential resource for top-level data and analysis covering the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) Software industry. The report includes easily comparable data on market value, volume, segmentation and market share, plus full five year market forecasts. It examines future problems, innovations and potential growth areas within the market.

Scope of the Report

* Contains an executive summary and data on value, volume and segmentation

* Provides textual analysis of the industry's prospects, competitive landscape and profiles of the leading companies

* Incorporates in-depth five forces competitive environment analysis and scorecards

* Compares data from Brazil, Russia, India, and China, alongside individual chapters on each country. .

* Includes a five-year forecast of the industry

Highlights

Brazil, Russian Federation, India and China (BRIC) are the emerging and fast growing countries within the software industry and had a total market value of $25.2 billion in 2011. India was the fastest growing country with a CAGR of 19.3% over the 2007-11 period.

Within the software industry, China is the leading country among the BRIC nations with market revenues of $14.6 billion in 2011.

China is expected to lead the software industry in the BRIC nations with a value of $28.5 billion in 2016, followed by Russia, India, Brazil with expected values of $6.3, $6.1 and $5.1 billion, respectively.


Why you should buy this report

* Spot future trends and developments



* Inform your business decisions



* Add weight to presentations and marketing materials



* Save time carrying out entry-level research



Market Definition

The computer software market consists of systems and application software. Systems software comprises operating systems, network and database management, and other systems software. Application software comprises general business productivity and home use applications, cross-industry and vertical market applications, and other application software. Market value figures are assessed at manufacturer selling price (MSP), based on revenues from software sales and licenses. Any currency conversions used in the creation of this report have been calculated using constant 2011 annual average exchange rates.





TABLE OF CONTENTS


Introduction 11


What is this report about? 11


Who is the target reader? 11


How to use this report 11


Definitions 11


BRIC Software Industry Outlook 12


Software in Brazil 15


Market Overview 15


Market Data 16


Market Segmentation 17


Market outlook 19


Five forces analysis 20


Macroeconomic indicators 26


Software in China 28


Market Overview 28


Market Data 29


Market Segmentation 30


Market outlook 32


Five forces analysis 33


Macroeconomic indicators 39


Software in India 41


Market Overview 41


Market Data 42


Market Segmentation 43


Market outlook 45


Five forces analysis 46


Macroeconomic indicators 52


Software in Russia 54


Market Overview 54


Market Data 55


Market Segmentation 56


Market outlook 58


Five forces analysis 59


Macroeconomic indicators 65


Company Profiles 67


Leading companies 67


Appendix 97


Methodology 97



LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: BRIC software industry, revenue($bn), 2007-16 11


Table 2: BRIC software industry, revenue($bn), 2007-11 12


Table 3: BRIC software industry, revenue($bn), 2011-16 13


Table 4: Brazil software market value: $ billion, 2007–11 15


Table 5: Brazil software market category segmentation: $ billion, 2011 16


Table 6: Brazil software market geography segmentation: $ billion, 2011 17


Table 7: Brazil software market value forecast: $ billion, 2011–16 18


Table 8: Brazil size of population (million), 2007–11 25


Table 9: Brazil gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2007–11 25


Table 10: Brazil gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2007–11 25


Table 11: Brazil inflation, 2007–11 26


Table 12: Brazil consumer price index (absolute), 2007–11 26


Table 13: Brazil exchange rate, 2007–11 26


Table 14: China software market value: $ billion, 2007–11 28


Table 15: China software market category segmentation: $ billion, 2011 29


Table 16: China software market geography segmentation: $ billion, 2011 30


Table 17: China software market value forecast: $ billion, 2011–16 31


Table 18: China size of population (million), 2007–11 38


Table 19: China gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2007–11 38


Table 20: China gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2007–11 38


Table 21: China inflation, 2007–11 39


Table 22: China consumer price index (absolute), 2007–11 39


Table 23: China exchange rate, 2007–11 39


Table 24: India software market value: $ billion, 2007–11 41


Table 25: India software market category segmentation: $ billion, 2011 42


Table 26: India software market geography segmentation: $ billion, 2011 43


Table 27: India software market value forecast: $ billion, 2011–16 44


Table 28: India size of population (million), 2007–11 51


Table 29: India gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2007–11 51


Table 30: India gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2007–11 51


Table 31: India inflation, 2007–11 52


Table 32: India consumer price index (absolute), 2007–11 52


Table 33: India exchange rate, 2007–11 52


Table 34: Russia software market value: $ billion, 2007–11 54


Table 35: Russia software market category segmentation: $ billion, 2011 55


Table 36: Russia software market geography segmentation: $ billion, 2011 56


Table 37: Russia software market value forecast: $ billion, 2011–16 57


Table 38: Russia size of population (million), 2007–11 64


Table 39: Russia gdp (constant 2000 prices, $ billion), 2007–11 64


Table 40: Russia gdp (current prices, $ billion), 2007–11 64


Table 41: Russia inflation, 2007–11 65


Table 42: Russia consumer price index (absolute), 2007–11 65


Table 43: Russia exchange rate, 2007–11 65


Table 44: International Business Machines Corporation: key facts 66


Table 45: International Business Machines Corporation: key financials ($) 67


Table 46: International Business Machines Corporation: key financial ratios 68


Table 47: Microsoft Corporation: key facts 70


Table 48: Microsoft Corporation: key financials ($) 71


Table 49: Microsoft Corporation: key financial ratios 71


Table 50: Oracle Corporation: key facts 73


Table 51: Oracle Corporation: key financials ($) 74


Table 52: Oracle Corporation: key financial ratios 75


Table 53: TOTVS S.A.: key facts 77


Table 54: TOTVS S.A.: key financials ($) 78


Table 55: TOTVS S.A.: key financials (BRL) 78


Table 56: TOTVS S.A.: key financial ratios 79


Table 57: Hewlett-Packard Company: key facts 81


Table 58: Hewlett-Packard Company: key financials ($) 83


Table 59: Hewlett-Packard Company: key financial ratios 83


Table 60: Infosys Limited: key facts 85


Table 61: Infosys Limited: key financials ($) 86


Table 62: Infosys Limited: key financial ratios 87


Table 63: Tata Consultancy Services Limited: key facts 89


Table 64: Tata Consultancy Services Limited: key financials ($) 90


Table 65: Tata Consultancy Services Limited: key financials (Rs.) 91


Table 66: Tata Consultancy Services Limited: key financial ratios 91


Table 67: SAP AG: key facts 93


Table 68: SAP AG: key financials ($) 94


Table 69: SAP AG: key financials (€) 94


Table 70: SAP AG: key financial ratios 94



LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Brazil software market value: $ billion, 2007–11 13


Figure 2: Brazil software market category segmentation: % share, by value, 2011 14


Figure 3: Brazil software market geography segmentation: % share, by value, 2011 15


Figure 4: Brazil software market value forecast: $ billion, 2011–16 16


Figure 5: Forces driving competition in the software market in Brazil, 2011 17


Figure 6: Drivers of buyer power in the software market in Brazil, 2011 18


Figure 7: Drivers of supplier power in the software market in Brazil, 2011 19


Figure 8: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the software market in Brazil, 2011 20


Figure 9: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the software market in Brazil, 2011 21


Figure 10: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the software market in Brazil, 2011 22


Figure 11: China software market value: $ billion, 2007–11 26


Figure 12: China software market category segmentation: % share, by value, 2011 27


Figure 13: China software market geography segmentation: % share, by value, 2011 28


Figure 14: China software market value forecast: $ billion, 2011–16 29


Figure 15: Forces driving competition in the software market in China, 2011 30


Figure 16: Drivers of buyer power in the software market in China, 2011 31


Figure 17: Drivers of supplier power in the software market in China, 2011 32


Figure 18: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the software market in China, 2011 33


Figure 19: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the software market in China, 2011 34


Figure 20: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the software market in China, 2011 35


Figure 21: India software market value: $ billion, 2007–11 39


Figure 22: India software market category segmentation: % share, by value, 2011 40


Figure 23: India software market geography segmentation: % share, by value, 2011 41


Figure 24: India software market value forecast: $ billion, 2011–16 42


Figure 25: Forces driving competition in the software market in India, 2011 43


Figure 26: Drivers of buyer power in the software market in India, 2011 44


Figure 27: Drivers of supplier power in the software market in India, 2011 45


Figure 28: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the software market in India, 2011 46


Figure 29: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the software market in India, 2011 47


Figure 30: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the software market in India, 2011 48


Figure 31: Russia software market value: $ billion, 2007–11 52


Figure 32: Russia software market category segmentation: % share, by value, 2011 53


Figure 33: Russia software market geography segmentation: % share, by value, 2011 54


Figure 34: Russia software market value forecast: $ billion, 2011–16 55


Figure 35: Forces driving competition in the software market in Russia, 2011 56


Figure 36: Drivers of buyer power in the software market in Russia, 2011 57


Figure 37: Drivers of supplier power in the software market in Russia, 2011 58


Figure 38: Factors influencing the likelihood of new entrants in the software market in Russia, 2011 59


Figure 39: Factors influencing the threat of substitutes in the software market in Russia, 2011 60


Figure 40: Drivers of degree of rivalry in the software market in Russia, 2011 61


Figure 41: International Business Machines Corporation: revenues & profitability 66


Figure 42: International Business Machines Corporation: assets & liabilities 67


Figure 43: Microsoft Corporation: revenues & profitability 70


Figure 44: Microsoft Corporation: assets & liabilities 70


Figure 45: Oracle Corporation: revenues & profitability 73


Figure 46: Oracle Corporation: assets & liabilities 74


Figure 47: TOTVS S.A.: revenues & profitability 77


Figure 48: TOTVS S.A.: assets & liabilities 78


Figure 49: Hewlett-Packard Company: revenues & profitability 82


Figure 50: Hewlett-Packard Company: assets & liabilities 82


Figure 51: International Business Machines Corporation: revenues & profitability 85


Figure 52: International Business Machines Corporation: assets & liabilities 86


Figure 53: Microsoft Corporation: revenues & profitability 89


Figure 54: Microsoft Corporation: assets & liabilities 89


Figure 55: Oracle Corporation: revenues & profitability 92


Figure 56: Oracle Corporation: assets & liabilities 93


Figure 57: International Business Machines Corporation: revenues & profitability 96


Figure 58: International Business Machines Corporation: assets & liabilities 97


Figure 59: Infosys Limited: revenues & profitability 100


Figure 60: Infosys Limited: assets & liabilities 101


Figure 61: Microsoft Corporation: revenues & profitability 104


Figure 62: Microsoft Corporation: assets & liabilities 104


Figure 63: Tata Consultancy Services Limited: revenues & profitability 107


Figure 64: Tata Consultancy Services Limited: assets & liabilities 108


Figure 65: International Business Machines Corporation: revenues & profitability 111


Figure 66: International Business Machines Corporation: assets & liabilities 112


Figure 67: Microsoft Corporation: revenues & profitability 115


Figure 68: Microsoft Corporation: assets & liabilities 115


Figure 69: Oracle Corporation: revenues & profitability 118


Figure 70: Oracle Corporation: assets & liabilities 119


Figure 71: SAP AG: revenues & profitability 122


Figure 72: SAP AG: assets & liabilities 122


To order this report:
Software_and_Consulting Industry:
Software - BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) Industry Guide

__________________________


Nicolas Bombourg
Reportlinker
Email: [email protected]
US: (805)652-2626
Intl: +1 805-652-2626

 

 

SOURCE Reportlinker

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.