|By PR Newswire||
|January 22, 2013 11:39 AM EST||
NEW YORK, Jan. 22, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- In 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission mandated that public companies submit portions of annual (10-K) and quarterly (10-Q) reports—in a digitized format known as eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL). The goal of this type of data was to provide more relevant, timely, and reliable "interactive" data to investors and analysts. The XBRL-formatted data is meant to allow users to manipulate and organize the financial information according to their own purposes faster, cheaper, and more easily than current alternatives.
But how useful and usable is the new data to analysts and investors? The authors, early proponents of interactive data, from Columbia Business School's Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis (CEASA) recently completed a review of the state of XBRL, with a focus on its usefulness and usability for security analysis. The study questions the reliability of the data, the simplicity and stability of the underlying taxonomy and architecture, as well as the lack of user tools that add value and are easily integrated into an investor's or analyst's existing work flow and tools. As a result, the researchers conclude that XBRL has promised more than it has delivered to date and is at risk of becoming obsolete for use by analysts and investors.
However, the authors recommend specific changes that could make the formatted data more useful to investors and analysts. First, the entire XBRL stakeholder community must reduce significantly the error rate and limit unnecessary "extensions" (company-specific data identifiers or "tags"). Steps that might achieve this include: greater regulatory oversight and enforcement, mandatory audits of the data and tags, or requirements around meeting the XBRL US organization's error and quality checks. Second, the entities that file the XBRL-formatted financial reports should focus their energy on improving the quality of their data, rather than on trying to destroy the SEC's XBRL regulation. Third, the ongoing development of XBRL technology should be taken over and run by technologists, rather than accountants and regulators. An interesting approach for this might include partnering with major business information system vendors (like IBM, Oracle, and SAP), the key web-based financial information suppliers (like Google and Yahoo), and possibly even the major data aggregators (Bloomberg, CapitalIQ, Factset, and Thomson Reuters) not only to ensure that the SEC's regulatory data can be used effectively by investors and analysts, but, more importantly, to help improve the XBRL technology and usability overall.
"The potential for interactive data to democratize financial information and transform transparency remains stronger than ever, and many investors and analysts wish that the data were more useful today," the researchers wrote in the study. "But unless stakeholders focus on improving the data's reliability and on creating value-added, easily integrated tools, XBRL-tagged data is unlikely to be used by a significant number of investors or analysts."
About The Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis (CEASA)
The Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis (CEASA) at Columbia Business School provides an independent, objective voice for practical solutions in financial reporting and analysis.
Drawing on the wisdom of leading experts in academia, industry, and government, the center produces sound research and identifies best practices on relevant issues. CEASA's guiding criteria are to serve the public interest by supporting the integrity of financial reporting and the efficiency of capital markets. For more information, visit www.gsb.columbia.edu/ceasa.
About Columbia Business School
Led by Dean Glenn Hubbard, the Russell L. Carson Professor of Finance and Economics, Columbia Business School is at the forefront of management education for a rapidly changing world. The school's cutting-edge curriculum bridges academic theory and practice, equipping students with an entrepreneurial mindset to recognize and capture opportunity in a competitive business environment. Beyond academic rigor and teaching excellence, the school offers programs that are designed to give students practical experience making decisions in real-world environments. The school offers MBA and Executive MBA (EMBA) degrees, as well as non-degree Executive Education programs. For more information, visit www.gsb.columbia.edu.
SOURCE Columbia Business School
Dec. 10, 2016 09:15 PM EST Reads: 1,353
Dec. 10, 2016 07:30 PM EST Reads: 1,816
Dec. 10, 2016 07:00 PM EST Reads: 4,152
Dec. 10, 2016 06:45 PM EST Reads: 1,104
Dec. 10, 2016 06:30 PM EST Reads: 1,971
Dec. 10, 2016 06:30 PM EST Reads: 1,031
Dec. 10, 2016 06:30 PM EST Reads: 1,549
Dec. 10, 2016 06:15 PM EST Reads: 1,095
Dec. 10, 2016 05:30 PM EST Reads: 1,010
Dec. 10, 2016 05:15 PM EST Reads: 1,425
Dec. 10, 2016 05:15 PM EST Reads: 2,383
Dec. 10, 2016 04:30 PM EST Reads: 1,840
Dec. 10, 2016 04:30 PM EST Reads: 1,930
Dec. 10, 2016 03:30 PM EST Reads: 946
Dec. 10, 2016 01:45 PM EST Reads: 781
Dec. 10, 2016 01:00 PM EST Reads: 446
Dec. 10, 2016 12:45 PM EST Reads: 2,176
Dec. 10, 2016 12:15 PM EST Reads: 7,530
Dec. 10, 2016 12:00 PM EST Reads: 2,451
DevOps is being widely accepted (if not fully adopted) as essential in enterprise IT. But as Enterprise DevOps gains maturity, expands scope, and increases velocity, the need for data-driven decisions across teams becomes more acute. DevOps teams in any modern business must wrangle the ‘digital exhaust’ from the delivery toolchain, "pervasive" and "cognitive" computing, APIs and services, mobile devices and applications, the Internet of Things, and now even blockchain. In this power panel at @...
Dec. 10, 2016 12:00 PM EST Reads: 1,146