Weblogic Authors: Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Michael Meiner, Michael Bushong, Avi Rosenthal

Related Topics: Weblogic

Weblogic: Article

RMI Interoperability - In a clasloader of its own

RMI Interoperability - In a clasloader of its own

If you've had the pleasure of working with BEA WebLogic Server for several years, you may know that RMI/T3 calls between different releases of the server used to be disallowed ­ to be buzzword -compliant, the releases were not "wire compatible."

For example, you couldn't call an EJB deployed on WebLogic Server 4.5.1 from a WebLogic Server 5.1 application. This often meant that groups of applications had to be migrated together to new versions of WebLogic Server.

The lack of wire compatibility became more of a problem as users began to put increasingly sophisticated WebLogic Server configurations into production. Engineering stepped up to the mark and WebLogic Server 6.1 became the RMI/T3 "interoperability baseline" ­ interoperability between 6.1 and a number of future releases is designed into the product. New features such as Web services and enhanced RMI/IIOP also provide creative alternatives.

Not everyone has the luxury of green field sites using the latest WebLogic Server releases. In this article, I describe a scheme for sending JMS messages to both a WebLogic Server 5.1 application and a WebLogic Server 6.1 application from a single client. The approach I take is to use a special class loader that allows both versions of the RMI stack to be loaded into a single Java Virtual Machine (JVM).

A warning: you might need your propeller-head hats for some of this. I hope you come out the other side with an enhanced understanding of how class loaders work and how to use them to your advantage. The technique is not limited to addressing WebLogic Server interoperability problems; it can be applied wherever you want to load more than one version of a particular code base in a single JVM.

The full source code for this article can be found on the WLDJ Web site at www.sys-con.com/weblogic/sourcec.cfm.

So What's The Problem?
For a client to engage in RMI communication with a particular version of WebLogic Server, it must have the appropriate classes available. Usually, this means adding the WebLogic classes directory (for 5.1) or weblogic.jar (for 6.1) to the client's system classpath. The client uses these classes to communicate with the server and RMI stubs for application types are then retrieved from the server at runtime. Unfortunately, RMI classes and stubs from WebLogic Server 5.1 are not compatible with those from WebLogic Server 6.1; they can't be loaded together.

Java uses class loaders to control how classes are located and loaded into the virtual machine. Each class used by a program belongs to a class loader and, by default, a method uses its caller's class loader to load other classes. Class loaders are arranged in a hierarchy, with the Java boot, extension, and system class loaders at the top of the hierarchy. By convention, class loaders defer to their parents, meaning that when asked to load a particular class they give their parent class loader the option to load it instead. This is usually sensible; it minimizes the number of instances of a class that are loaded and allows parts of an application that use different class loaders to communicate through a set of common classes loaded by a parent class loader.

It's quite possible for a class with the same name to be loaded independently in two different class loaders and in this case the two instances are treated as distinct. By creating appropriate class loaders, you can partition parts of your application into separate "sandboxes" and ensure that classes one application component loads do not affect other components. This is what WebLogic Server 6.1 does to ensure that Web applications and enterprise applications are kept separate from one another. Refer to http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs61/ programming/packaging.html#1048725 for details. The WebLogic Server class loader also supports dynamic loading and unloading (hot deployment) of Web applications and enterprise applications. An interesting article on writing dynamic class loaders can be found at www.javageeks.com/Papers/ClassForName/index.html.

By now, I think you can see where this is going. We should be able to load the two versions of the WebLogic Server RMI classes in separate class loaders. Our client needs to access both JNDI and JMS services from the two servers. The services are implemented differently in the two server versions, and we'll need to load two sets of the classes and stubs. We can't load everything in isolation though; the JNDI and JMS interfaces must be loaded in a single class loader so we can compose a useful program that calls both servers. Figure 1 shows the class loader hierarchy we will use.

An alternative strategy would be to load one version of the RMI classes and stubs in the same class loader as the controlling code (the main method in our example). This would be the case if you were using the technique to call out from a servlet running in one version of WebLogic Server to an Enterprise JavaBean running in another. I chose to use a distinct class loader for each version of the RMI classes because the symmetry makes the code simpler to understand. However, the class loader implementation I provide allows you to take either approach.

The Isolating Class Loader
If you've been paying attention, you might be wondering about the previous paragraph. How would a WebLogic Server 6.1 class loader work if the WebLogic Server 5.1 RMI classes were loaded in the system classpath? When asked to load a particular class, wouldn't the WebLogic Server 6.1 class loader first call the system class loader (its parent), which would erroneously load a WebLogic Server 5.1 version of the class?

This would certainly be the case for a conventional class loader, which would always defer to its parent first, but I've created an unconventional class loader, IsolatingClassloader. Each IsolatingClassloader is constructed with a list of packages and classes that it should load, and a class path that specifies where to load them from. This method is called to load a class and is shown in Listing 1.

IsolatingClassLoader first determines whether the class name is one that should be loaded in isolation, and if so, attempts to discover and load the class and make it available to the JVM. The class loader asks its parent to load the class only if the class is one that shouldn't be isolated or an implementation cannot be found.

Putting It To Work, The JMS Client
The supplied example client has four command-line parameters, the classpath and JNDI provider URL for each of the servers. Listing 2 is an example of the client running against the two servers. Note that I added the WebLogic Server 5.1 weblogicaux.jar file to the system classpath. This contains the JNDI and JMS interface classes.

To call a particular version of the server, we first construct an instance of IsolatingClassLoader that will isolate the WebLogic implementation classes (package names beginning with weblogic and COM.rsa) and set an appropriate classpath. We can then use the code in Listing 3 to call either version of the server. All that changes from server to server is the isolating class loader instance and the JNDI provider URL.

I guess you're wondering what those setContextClassLoader calls are doing? These calls set a "context class loader," which is associated with the current thread. The Java JNDI and RMI interface classes use the context class loader to determine how to load the implementation classes.

I encourage you to download the source code to see just how elegant the class loader solution is. With the exception of the IsolatingClassLoader setup and the calls to setContextClassLoader, the application code uses the standard J2EE API's.

Bridging Interface Differences
By now you can appreciate the appropriate emerging pattern when using IsolatingClassLoader to call several different versions of an implementation. Interface code is loaded in a common class loader; implementation code that needs to be isolated is loaded in its own IsolatingClassLoader. But what if the interfaces themselves vary?

In fact, this is the case for our JMS example. WebLogic Server 5.1 uses JMS 1.0.1, whereas WebLogic Server 6.1 uses JMS 1.0.2b. There are minor API differences in the handling of TopicConnections between the two versions of the JMS specification. Even if you don't create a TopicConnection, you'll run into this problem when you attempt to employ the IsolatingClassLoader technique to make WebLogic Server 5.1 JMS calls from a WebLogic Server 6.1 application. WebLogic Server 5.1 RMI performs strict type- checking that uses the stub interface and throws a ClassCastException if the local interface type does not exactly match the remote interface type. The mirror image of the scheme, with a WebLogic Server 6.1 IsolatingClassLoader embedded in a WebLogic Server 5.1 server, works fine because WebLogic Server 6.1 RMI uses dynamic proxies and is more relaxed about the API differences.

All is not lost. I've successfully extended the IsolatingClassLoader pattern to address this problem. I don't have room to cover the full solution here, but I will briefly describe it. I used a proxy object, residing in the common WebLogic Server 6.1 class loader, which maps JMS 1.0.2b calls to a neutral interface (a subset of the JMS 1.0.1 and 1.0.2b interfaces). A second proxy object, which is loaded by the WebLogic Server 5.1 IsolatingClassLoader, maps calls from the neutral interface to the JMS 1.0.1 interface. I managed to hide this implementation from application code by binding the entry points of the interfaces (connection factories) into the WebLogic Server 6.1 JNDI tree. Look out for this trick in the JMS Bridge that comes with the next release of WebLogic Server.

That's all for this month. I hope I've given you a different perspective on Java class loaders, and that you'll find it useful when wiring WebLogic Server applications together. Till the next time…

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Leading companies, from the Global Fortune 500 to the smallest companies, are adopting hybrid cloud as the path to business advantage. Hybrid cloud depends on cloud services and on-premises infrastructure working in unison. Successful implementations require new levels of data mobility, enabled by an automated and seamless flow across on-premises and cloud resources. In his general session at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Tevis, an IBM Storage Software Technical Strategist and Customer Solution Architec...
Nordstrom is transforming the way that they do business and the cloud is the key to enabling speed and hyper personalized customer experiences. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ken Schow, VP of Engineering at Nordstrom, discussed some of the key learnings and common pitfalls of large enterprises moving to the cloud. This includes strategies around choosing a cloud provider(s), architecture, and lessons learned. In addition, he covered some of the best practices for structured team migration an...
Product connectivity goes hand and hand these days with increased use of personal data. New IoT devices are becoming more personalized than ever before. In his session at 22nd Cloud Expo | DXWorld Expo, Nicolas Fierro, CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions, will discuss how in order to protect your data and privacy, IoT applications need to embrace Blockchain technology for a new level of product security never before seen - or needed.
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settle...
BnkToTheFuture.com is the largest online investment platform for investing in FinTech, Bitcoin and Blockchain companies. We believe the future of finance looks very different from the past and we aim to invest and provide trading opportunities for qualifying investors that want to build a portfolio in the sector in compliance with international financial regulations.
No hype cycles or predictions of a gazillion things here. IoT is here. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, an Associate Partner of Analytics, IoT & Cybersecurity at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He also discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data...
Coca-Cola’s Google powered digital signage system lays the groundwork for a more valuable connection between Coke and its customers. Digital signs pair software with high-resolution displays so that a message can be changed instantly based on what the operator wants to communicate or sell. In their Day 3 Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Chambers, Global Group Director, Digital Innovation, Coca-Cola, and Vidya Nagarajan, a Senior Product Manager at Google, discussed how from store operations and ...
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Raju Shreewastava, founder of Big Data Trunk, provided a fun and simple way to introduce Machine Leaning to anyone and everyone. He solved a machine learning problem and demonstrated an easy way to be able to do machine learning without even coding. Raju Shreewastava is the founder of Big Data Trunk (www.BigDataTrunk.com), a Big Data Training and consulting firm with offices in the United States. He previously led the data warehouse/business intelligence and B...
"IBM is really all in on blockchain. We take a look at sort of the history of blockchain ledger technologies. It started out with bitcoin, Ethereum, and IBM evaluated these particular blockchain technologies and found they were anonymous and permissionless and that many companies were looking for permissioned blockchain," stated René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Conventi...
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
When shopping for a new data processing platform for IoT solutions, many development teams want to be able to test-drive options before making a choice. Yet when evaluating an IoT solution, it’s simply not feasible to do so at scale with physical devices. Building a sensor simulator is the next best choice; however, generating a realistic simulation at very high TPS with ease of configurability is a formidable challenge. When dealing with multiple application or transport protocols, you would be...
Smart cities have the potential to change our lives at so many levels for citizens: less pollution, reduced parking obstacles, better health, education and more energy savings. Real-time data streaming and the Internet of Things (IoT) possess the power to turn this vision into a reality. However, most organizations today are building their data infrastructure to focus solely on addressing immediate business needs vs. a platform capable of quickly adapting emerging technologies to address future ...
We are given a desktop platform with Java 8 or Java 9 installed and seek to find a way to deploy high-performance Java applications that use Java 3D and/or Jogl without having to run an installer. We are subject to the constraint that the applications be signed and deployed so that they can be run in a trusted environment (i.e., outside of the sandbox). Further, we seek to do this in a way that does not depend on bundling a JRE with our applications, as this makes downloads and installations rat...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
In this strange new world where more and more power is drawn from business technology, companies are effectively straddling two paths on the road to innovation and transformation into digital enterprises. The first path is the heritage trail – with “legacy” technology forming the background. Here, extant technologies are transformed by core IT teams to provide more API-driven approaches. Legacy systems can restrict companies that are transitioning into digital enterprises. To truly become a lead...
Digital Transformation (DX) is not a "one-size-fits all" strategy. Each organization needs to develop its own unique, long-term DX plan. It must do so by realizing that we now live in a data-driven age, and that technologies such as Cloud Computing, Big Data, the IoT, Cognitive Computing, and Blockchain are only tools. In her general session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rebecca Wanta explained how the strategy must focus on DX and include a commitment from top management to create great IT jobs, monitor ...
"Cloud Academy is an enterprise training platform for the cloud, specifically public clouds. We offer guided learning experiences on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and all the surrounding methodologies and technologies that you need to know and your teams need to know in order to leverage the full benefits of the cloud," explained Alex Brower, VP of Marketing at Cloud Academy, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clar...
The IoT Will Grow: In what might be the most obvious prediction of the decade, the IoT will continue to expand next year, with more and more devices coming online every single day. What isn’t so obvious about this prediction: where that growth will occur. The retail, healthcare, and industrial/supply chain industries will likely see the greatest growth. Forrester Research has predicted the IoT will become “the backbone” of customer value as it continues to grow. It is no surprise that retail is ...