Welcome!

Weblogic Authors: Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Michael Meiner, Michael Bushong, Avi Rosenthal

Related Topics: Weblogic

Weblogic: Article

The Race to Create Standards

The Race to Create Standards

The number of Web service business process (BP) specifications trying to make their way to standards status makes it difficult to tell who is doing what, especially given that many efforts are redundant.

This article makes sense out of the morass by classifying Web service BP specifications into four categories.

  • Business analyst graphs: When business analysts write the high-level business logic for a BP, they need a standard way to communicate that logic, usually graphically, to each other and to BP programmers.
  • Message choreography: When multiple BPs want to interoperate there needs to be an agreement on not only what messages are to be sent back and forth, which is provided by WSDL, but also the order in which messages are to be sent.
  • Platform-independent business process programming languages: When writing the code to actually execute a BP it can be very compelling to use a solution that will run on Java, .NET, and everywhere else.
  • Platform-specific business process programming languages: BP languages written directly for platforms like J2EE get a jump on everyone else by inheriting from mature, proven platforms.

    We will explore each of these programming categories and explain what specifications are available in each category and their status. Please keep in mind that the status reflects the state of the specifications at the time of this writing (April 2003).

    Business Analyst Graphs
    The job of business analysts is to express the business logic that a BP is supposed to implement. Business analysts typically are not programmers so they express their logic through a combination of graphs and prose. It is the job of BP programmers to take the business logic provided by the business analysts and create running code.

    Specifications such as BPDM and BPMN (see Table 1) are intended to make it easier for business analysts to communicate with each other and with BP programmers through UML-based models. Such models both standardize notation amongst business analysts as well as provide a foundation by which code skeletons can be automatically generated for BP programmers from business analyst's graphs.

    BPDM has not yet begun substantive work and there are concerns about how appropriate BPMN is for business analysts. BPMN is so complicated it almost seems to be targeted at BP programmers.

    Message Choreography
    For multiple BPs to interoperate, all participants in the conversation must agree not only as to what messages are to be sent, which is specified by WSDL, but also the order in which they are expected. For example, a WSDL description says that a purchaser can receive purchase orders and a shipper receives shipping orders, but it cannot say that once a purchaser receives a purchase order the next thing the purchaser will do is send out a shipping order.

    Message choreography specifications (see Table 2) tackle this problem by providing mechanisms to describe messaging order. There are two general approaches to message choreography - Turing-complete and declarative.

    Turing-complete solutions, typified by BPEL Business Protocols and BPML Abstract Processes, use programming language to describe message choreography. Declarative solutions use directed graphs.

    The trade-off between the two types of solutions is that the Turing-complete solutions can describe the message choreography in more detail than a declarative solution but at the cost of making the message choreography harder to understand and possibly more brittle. To understand a Turing-complete message choreography you must literally read and understand source code. In addition, one of the keys to interoperability is to know what not to say; in some ways Turing-complete solutions enable you to say too much. In practice the two solutions are complementary in that you can create a higher-level description using a declarative solution and then fill in details using a Turing-complete solution.

    Although WS-Chor has taken WSCI, which is the foundation of BPML, as an input, it is not yet clear if WS-Chor will try to standardize a Turing-complete or a declarative message choreography solution. At the time of this writing the issue was still open within the working group.

    Business Process Programming Language
    BP code is typically written using a dedicated BP programming language (see Table 3), usually via a graphical tool. Two flavors of BP programming languages are being developed: platform independent and platform specific.

    The term platform independent is generally taken to mean a BP execution language that can run on top of J2EE or .NET. But the term "independent" is a misnomer. It would be more accurate to say "a new platform that runs on top of existing platforms." For example, BPEL and BPML, both "platform independent" solutions, define a full XML-based programming language, an exception handling model, a compensation model, a threading model, a message handling model, a type system, and a process life-cycle model. By any reasonable definition they constitute platforms in their own right.

    Both BPEL and BPML are still very new so their feature set is limited. For example, they can only deal with XML values, which can only be manipulated using XPATH 1.0. They don't have easy to use models for communicating with local resources such as databases and file system; they don't have solutions for issues such as deployment or access control, etc. But these limitations only reflect their relative immaturity rather than oversight or design flaw. Over time, as the specifications mature, they will inevitably grow in features and complexity.

    JSR 207 (Process Definition for Java; PD4J), which was proposed and is being led by BEA, typifies a platform-specific standard. PD4J takes the full-featured, fully developed, standardized J2EE platform and provides a few simple extensions to enable BP programming. While it is possible to write BPs on top of J2EE today, PD4J adds BP-specific extensions to J2EE in order to make it easier to write BP programs.

    BPEL in particular has been positively received by efforts such as Siebel's Universal Application Network (UAN), which will use BPEL to write templates that describe best practices for certain types of BPs, such as a BP for entering information about a new employee into multiple independent data stores in a company. By using BPEL, Siebel's UAN BPs can potentially be imported and run across a wide variety of platforms. Since Siebel partners with all the major application vendors, this flexibility is desirable and the cost in terms of limited functionality is acceptable.

    PD4J, scheduled for completion in March 2004, will be the officially approved Java standard for BP programming. In addition, because it benefits from J2EE,PD4J will have access to more features and be more mature than BPEL or BPML. Therefore, PD4J will almost certainly be the richest and most portable BP programming solution available.

    WebLogic Integration 8.1 will ship with support for Java Processes (JPD), which is the foundation technology for PD4J. When the PD4J expert committee releases the official PD4J standard BEA will migrate JPD programs to the standardized format.

    Users will be able to move between platform-independent and platform-specific business process programming languages via import/export functions. For example, after the release of WLI 8.1, BEA will provide users with tools to enable the import and export of BPEL process definitions to and from JPD and upon standardization, PD4J.

    It is not clear if WS-Chor will attempt to create a platform-independent programming execution language. The issue is being actively discussed within the working group.

    Conclusion
    Looking at the status of the various listed specifications described above you can see that the race to create Web service-based BP standards is just starting. Unlike more mature business process standards such as ebXML there is still an enormous amount of work to be done before Web service business processing can be said to be mature. In the meantime, you are encouraged to review the various specifications and to evaluate them in terms of their technical completeness as well as how open a standard they might eventually become.

    References

  • Business Process Definition Metamodel - Request for Proposal (BPDM): www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?bei/2003-01-06
  • Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (BPEL): http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/webservices/BPEL4WS.jsp
  • Business Process Markup Language (BPML): www.bpmi.org/specifications.esp
  • Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN): www.bpmi.org/specifications.esp
  • JSR 207 Expert Group - Process Definition for Java (PD4J): http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=207
  • W3C Choreography Working Group (WS-Chor): www.w3.org/2002/ws/chor/
  • Web Service Choreography Interface (WSCI): www.w3.org/TR/wsci/
  • More Stories By Yaron Y. Goland

    Yaron Y. Goland is a senior principal technologist in the Office of the CTO at BEA, with responsibility for BP standards. Yaron is a coauthor on BPEL and BEA’s representative to the W3C Choreography Working Group.

    Comments (0)

    Share your thoughts on this story.

    Add your comment
    You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

    In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


    IoT & Smart Cities Stories
    Dion Hinchcliffe is an internationally recognized digital expert, bestselling book author, frequent keynote speaker, analyst, futurist, and transformation expert based in Washington, DC. He is currently Chief Strategy Officer at the industry-leading digital strategy and online community solutions firm, 7Summits.
    Digital Transformation is much more than a buzzword. The radical shift to digital mechanisms for almost every process is evident across all industries and verticals. This is often especially true in financial services, where the legacy environment is many times unable to keep up with the rapidly shifting demands of the consumer. The constant pressure to provide complete, omnichannel delivery of customer-facing solutions to meet both regulatory and customer demands is putting enormous pressure on...
    IoT is rapidly becoming mainstream as more and more investments are made into the platforms and technology. As this movement continues to expand and gain momentum it creates a massive wall of noise that can be difficult to sift through. Unfortunately, this inevitably makes IoT less approachable for people to get started with and can hamper efforts to integrate this key technology into your own portfolio. There are so many connected products already in place today with many hundreds more on the h...
    The standardization of container runtimes and images has sparked the creation of an almost overwhelming number of new open source projects that build on and otherwise work with these specifications. Of course, there's Kubernetes, which orchestrates and manages collections of containers. It was one of the first and best-known examples of projects that make containers truly useful for production use. However, more recently, the container ecosystem has truly exploded. A service mesh like Istio addr...
    Digital Transformation: Preparing Cloud & IoT Security for the Age of Artificial Intelligence. As automation and artificial intelligence (AI) power solution development and delivery, many businesses need to build backend cloud capabilities. Well-poised organizations, marketing smart devices with AI and BlockChain capabilities prepare to refine compliance and regulatory capabilities in 2018. Volumes of health, financial, technical and privacy data, along with tightening compliance requirements by...
    Charles Araujo is an industry analyst, internationally recognized authority on the Digital Enterprise and author of The Quantum Age of IT: Why Everything You Know About IT is About to Change. As Principal Analyst with Intellyx, he writes, speaks and advises organizations on how to navigate through this time of disruption. He is also the founder of The Institute for Digital Transformation and a sought after keynote speaker. He has been a regular contributor to both InformationWeek and CIO Insight...
    Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settlement products to hedge funds and investment banks. After, he co-founded a revenue cycle management company where he learned about Bitcoin and eventually Ethereal. Andrew's role at ConsenSys Enterprise is a mul...
    To Really Work for Enterprises, MultiCloud Adoption Requires Far Better and Inclusive Cloud Monitoring and Cost Management … But How? Overwhelmingly, even as enterprises have adopted cloud computing and are expanding to multi-cloud computing, IT leaders remain concerned about how to monitor, manage and control costs across hybrid and multi-cloud deployments. It’s clear that traditional IT monitoring and management approaches, designed after all for on-premises data centers, are falling short in ...
    In his general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, discussed how Dice leverages data insights and tools to help both tech professionals and recruiters better understand how skills relate to each other and which skills are in high demand using interactive visualizations and salary indicator tools to maximize earning potential. Manish Dixit is VP of Product and Engineering at Dice. As the leader of the Product, Engineering and Data Sciences team at D...
    Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...