Weblogic Authors: Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Michael Meiner, Michael Bushong, Avi Rosenthal

Related Topics: Weblogic

Weblogic: Article

The Art of Capacity Planning

The Art of Capacity Planning

WebLogic Server runs on hardware ranging from PCs to high-end mainframes. Therefore, it's essential to carefully choose the level of hardware necessary to provide optimal performance for your WebLogic Server deployment.

This article focuses on the various steps involved in analyzing the constraints on your system components and enumerates several measures that can be taken to ensure that sufficient computing resources are available to support current and future usage levels.

What Is Capacity Planning?
Capacity planning is the process of determining what hardware and software configuration is required to adequately meet application needs. It helps define the number of concurrent users the system can support, the acceptable response times for the system, and the hardware and network infrastructure needed to handle those numbers.

It's important to realize that we cannot generalize this process because each application is different; instead we offer general guidelines that help estimate system capacity.

An iterative process, capacity planning is achieved by measuring the number of requests the server currently processes and how much demand each request places on the server resources, then using this data to calculate the computing resources (CPU, RAM, disk space, and network bandwidth) necessary to support current and future usage levels.

Why Is Capacity Planning Important?
The first and foremost reason is the user experience factor. Consider a system that can support only a given number of concurrent users while guaranteeing a reasonable response time. As many of us have experienced, when traffic increases on a major Web site that isn't adequately equipped to handle the surge, response time deteriorates significantly. Studies have shown that if a site's response time is more than 10 seconds, users tend to leave. This is generally a bad thing and should be avoided, as it's no secret that a Web site's downtime can result in a significant amount of lost business.

A second reason is that capacity planning helps you decide how to allocate resources for a system in terms of the CPUs, RAM, Internet connection bandwidth, and LAN infrastructure needed to support required performance levels and plan for future growth as well. Once we understand the limitations of the existing hardware configuration, we can estimate the amount of additional hardware needed to support any increased demands in performance.

Finally, capacity planning is important because it helps answer the question of what hardware and software infrastructure is needed to enable the current system deployment to achieve specified performance objectives.

Factors Affecting Capacity Planning
There are various factors to consider when conducting a capacity-planning exercise. Each of the following factors has a significant impact on system performance (and on system capacity as well). Before embarking on a capacity-planning exercise, it's essential to first tune the WebLogic Server for optimal performance. The WebLogic Performance and Tuning Guide (http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs70/perform/index.html) covers this topic extensively.

Programmatic and Web-Based Clients
There are two types of clients that can connect to a WebLogic Server:

1.   Web-based clients, such as Web browsers and HTTP proxies, use the HTTP or HTTPS (secure) protocol to to communicate with the server. Such a client can be treated as a Web browser client generating HTTP requests.

2.   Programmatic clients rely on the T3 or the IIOP protocol and use RMI to connect to the server.

The stateless nature of HTTP requires that the server handle more in terms of overhead. However, the benefits of HTTP clients, such as the availability of browsers and firewall compatibility, are numerous and are usually worth the performance costs.

On the other hand, programmatic clients are generally more efficient than HTTP clients because the T3 protocol does more of the presentation work on the client side. Programmatic clients typically call directly into EJB while Web clients usually go through servlets. The T3 protocol operates using sockets and has a long-standing connection to the server. Consequently, the WebLogic Server can support a larger number of programmatic client threads, which needs to be factored in when calculating the client connectivity bandwidth.

Protocol Used with Clients
The protocol used for communication between the WebLogic Server and the clients is another factor in determining the capacity of the deployments. A commonly used protocol for secure transactions is the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol. SSL is a very computing-intensive technology and the overhead of cryptography can significantly decrease the number of simultaneous connections that a system can support. There is a direct correlation between the capacity of the WebLogic Server and the number of SSL client connections. SSL can significantly reduce the capacity of the server, depending on the strength of encryption used in the SSL connections. Typically, for every SSL connection the server can support, it can handle up to three non-SSL connections.

Database Server Capacity and User Storage Requirements
Most WebLogic Server deployments rely upon back-end systems such as databases. The more reliance on such back-end systems, the more resources are consumed to meet these requests. The key issues to consider are the size of the data being transferred and the processing capacity of the database server.

Oftentimes installations find that their database server runs out of capacity much sooner than the WebLogic Server does. You must plan for a database server that is sufficiently robust to handle the application. Typically, a good application will require a database three to four times more powerful than the application server hardware. Additionally, it's good practice to place the WebLogic Server and the database on separate machines.

The inability to increase the CPU utilization on the WebLogic Server by increasing the number of users is a common problem and generally a sign of bottlenecks in the system. A good place to start investigating would be the database. It's quite possible that the WebLogic Server is spending much of its time waiting for database operations to complete. Increasing the load by adding more users can only aggravate the situation.

An application might also require user storage for operations that don't interact with a database, for instance, a WebLogic-based security realm to store security information for each user. In such cases, you should calculate the size required to store each user's information and multiply this by the total number of expected users to come up with the total user storage requirements.

Concurrent Sessions and Processes
One of the main goals of capacity planning is to set quantifiable goals for the deployment infrastructure. This requires determining the maximum number of concurrent sessions the WebLogic Server will be called upon to handle. This affects capacity, as the WebLogic Server has to track session objects (HTTP session objects or stateful session beans) in memory for each session. Use the size of the session data to calculate the amount of RAM needed for each additional user. Next, research the maximum number of clients that will make requests at the same time, and the frequency of each client request. The number of user interactions with WebLogic Server per second represents the total number of interactions per second that a given WebLogic Server deployment should be able to handle.

It's also essential to identify up front frequently accessed components and to allocate adequate resources to them. Typically, for Web deployments users access JSP pages (or servlets), while users in application deployments access EJB.

Additional processes running on the same machine can significantly affect the capacity (and performance) of the WebLogic deployment. The database and Web servers are two popular choices for hosting on a separate machine.

The random and unpredictable nature of user service requests often exacerbates the performance problems of Internet applications. When estimating the peak load, it's therefore advisable to plan for demand spikes and focus on the worst-case scenario (for instance, the spike in the number of visitors to a site advertised during the Olympics telecast, for instance). Another example would be the spike in traffic experienced by many online retailers during the holiday shopping season. These usage spikes can often result in significant server overload unless properly anticipated.

WebLogic Server Configuration (Single Server or Clustered)
There are many advantages to using WebLogic Server clusters. For instance, they're much more efficient and they offer failover capabilities. The key issues to consider when using a cluster are:

1.   Clusters rely on LAN for communication between the nodes. Large clusters performing in-memory replication of session data for EJB or servlet sessions require more bandwidth than smaller clusters. Consider the size of session data, the size of the cluster, and the processing power of the individual machines in computing the LAN bandwidth and network connectivity requirements. The combination of server capacity and network bandwidth determines the total capacity of a given system.

2.   If you're using a Web server to forward requests to a WebLogic Server cluster, sometimes the Web server can be the bottleneck. This can happen when using the supplied HttpClusterServlet and a proxy server, or one of the supported plug-ins. If the response time doesn't improve after adding servers to the cluster, and the Web server machine shows a CPU usage of over 95%, consider clustering the Web server or running it on more powerful hardware.

WebLogic Server Configuration
It's possible to have many WebLogic Server instances clustered together on a single multiprocessor machine. An alternative would be to have a cluster of fewer WebLogic Server instances distributed across many single (or dual) processor machines. There can be advantages in using the second approach:

1.   Increased protection from failover, since it's unlikely that all the individual machines would fail at the same time.

2.   JVM scalability has some practical limitations, and garbage collection is often a bottleneck on systems with many processors. Configuring a cluster of many smaller machines will ensure good JVM scalability. Additionally, the impact of garbage collection on the system's response time can be somewhat mitigated, because garbage collection can be staggered across the different JVMs.

Figure 1 shows the results from an internal benchmark indicating that having multiple smaller boxes offers better performance. We hasten to add that it's quite likely some applications won't conform to this behavior.

Application Design Issues
At the end of the day, WebLogic Server is basically a platform for user applications. Badly designed or unoptimized user applications can drastically slow down the performance of a given configuration. Therefore it's also essential to optimize the application by eliminating or reducing the hot spots and considering the working set/concurrency issues. An end-to-end perspective of the application characteristics is essential in order to diagnose and fix any performance problems. Application optimization and performance tuning WebLogic Server for your specific deployments always go hand-in-hand.

Capacity Planning Guidelines
Once you've developed your application, the next step is to determine the hardware requirements (on the chosen hardware platform). It's essential to choose a transaction scenario that represents the most frequent user flow transactions. In the case of an online bookseller, for instance, a typical transaction mix could be as follows. A user enters the site via the home page, uses the search options to scan through existing inventory, browses through certain titles, selects a title and adds it to the shopping cart, proceeds to checkout, enters credit card information, confirms the order, and finally exits.

There are several tools available to simulate clients (LoadRunner, WebLOAD, etc.). Use the transaction mix you designed in the previous step to generate the client load. Gradually increase the client load by adding more concurrent users. This is an iterative process, and the goal is to achieve as high a CPU utilization as possible. If the CPU utilization doesn't increase (and hasn't yet peaked out) with the addition of more users, stop and look for bottlenecks (in the database or the application). There are several commercially available profilers (IntroScope, OptimizeIt, and JProbe) that can be used to identify these hot spots.

In a finely tuned system, the CPU utilization (at steady state) is usually in the 90-95% range. While throughput won't increase with the addition of more load, response times, on the other hand, will increase as more clients are added. The throughput at this point determines the capacity of the hardware.

Figure 2 shows that increasing the number of clients beyond a certain point doesn't increase the throughput but has a significant effect on the response time. From the graph, decide on an acceptable response time. This, then, indicates the capacity of the hardware needed.

The first step in capacity planning is to set measurable and quantifiable goals for the deployment. As is evident from the iterative process, capacity planning isn't an exact science, hence the need to conservatively estimate your capacity requirements. This is further compounded by the fact that the system load can often be quite unpredictable and can vary randomly (hence the need to focus on the worst-case scenario). Finally, there can be no substitute for load testing. During load testing it's essential to use a transaction scenario that closely resembles the real-world conditions the application deployment will be subjected to.

We would like to acknowledge Joginder Minocha for his work on the WebLogic Capacity Planning benchmarks.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

@ThingsExpo Stories
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
"Space Monkey by Vivent Smart Home is a product that is a distributed cloud-based edge storage network. Vivent Smart Home, our parent company, is a smart home provider that places a lot of hard drives across homes in North America," explained JT Olds, Director of Engineering, and Brandon Crowfeather, Product Manager, at Vivint Smart Home, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Conference Guru has been named “Media Sponsor” of the 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. A valuable conference experience generates new contacts, sales leads, potential strategic partners and potential investors; helps gather competitive intelligence and even provides inspiration for new products and services. Conference Guru works with conference organizers to pass great deals to gre...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, demonstrated how to move beyond today's coding paradigm and shared the must-have mindsets for removing complexity from the develop...
In his Opening Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, John Considine, General Manager of IBM Cloud Infrastructure, led attendees through the exciting evolution of the cloud. He looked at this major disruption from the perspective of technology, business models, and what this means for enterprises of all sizes. John Considine is General Manager of Cloud Infrastructure Services at IBM. In that role he is responsible for leading IBM’s public cloud infrastructure including strategy, development, and offering m...
"Evatronix provides design services to companies that need to integrate the IoT technology in their products but they don't necessarily have the expertise, knowledge and design team to do so," explained Adam Morawiec, VP of Business Development at Evatronix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
Large industrial manufacturing organizations are adopting the agile principles of cloud software companies. The industrial manufacturing development process has not scaled over time. Now that design CAD teams are geographically distributed, centralizing their work is key. With large multi-gigabyte projects, outdated tools have stifled industrial team agility, time-to-market milestones, and impacted P&L stakeholders.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
"IBM is really all in on blockchain. We take a look at sort of the history of blockchain ledger technologies. It started out with bitcoin, Ethereum, and IBM evaluated these particular blockchain technologies and found they were anonymous and permissionless and that many companies were looking for permissioned blockchain," stated René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Conventi...
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Carl J. Levine, Senior Technical Evangelist for NS1, will objectively discuss how DNS is used to solve Digital Transformation challenges in large SaaS applications, CDNs, AdTech platforms, and other demanding use cases. Carl J. Levine is the Senior Technical Evangelist for NS1. A veteran of the Internet Infrastructure space, he has over a decade of experience with startups, networking protocols and Internet infrastructure, combined with the unique ability to it...
22nd International Cloud Expo, taking place June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and co-located with the 1st DXWorld Expo will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. Cloud computing is now being embraced by a majority of enterprises of all sizes. Yesterday's debate about public vs. private has transformed into the reality of hybrid cloud: a recent survey shows that 74% of enterprises have a hybrid cloud ...
"Cloud Academy is an enterprise training platform for the cloud, specifically public clouds. We offer guided learning experiences on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and all the surrounding methodologies and technologies that you need to know and your teams need to know in order to leverage the full benefits of the cloud," explained Alex Brower, VP of Marketing at Cloud Academy, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clar...
Gemini is Yahoo’s native and search advertising platform. To ensure the quality of a complex distributed system that spans multiple products and components and across various desktop websites and mobile app and web experiences – both Yahoo owned and operated and third-party syndication (supply), with complex interaction with more than a billion users and numerous advertisers globally (demand) – it becomes imperative to automate a set of end-to-end tests 24x7 to detect bugs and regression. In th...
"MobiDev is a software development company and we do complex, custom software development for everybody from entrepreneurs to large enterprises," explained Alan Winters, U.S. Head of Business Development at MobiDev, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Coca-Cola’s Google powered digital signage system lays the groundwork for a more valuable connection between Coke and its customers. Digital signs pair software with high-resolution displays so that a message can be changed instantly based on what the operator wants to communicate or sell. In their Day 3 Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Chambers, Global Group Director, Digital Innovation, Coca-Cola, and Vidya Nagarajan, a Senior Product Manager at Google, discussed how from store operations and ...
"There's plenty of bandwidth out there but it's never in the right place. So what Cedexis does is uses data to work out the best pathways to get data from the origin to the person who wants to get it," explained Simon Jones, Evangelist and Head of Marketing at Cedexis, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
SYS-CON Events announced today that CrowdReviews.com has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5–7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. CrowdReviews.com is a transparent online platform for determining which products and services are the best based on the opinion of the crowd. The crowd consists of Internet users that have experienced products and services first-hand and have an interest in letting other potential buye...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Telecom Reseller has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Telecom Reseller reports on Unified Communications, UCaaS, BPaaS for enterprise and SMBs. They report extensively on both customer premises based solutions such as IP-PBX as well as cloud based and hosted platforms.