| By Reuven Cohen | Article Rating: |
|
| September 15, 2008 07:40 AM EDT | Reads: |
4,501 |
Reuven Cohen's Blog
Lately it seems there are a number of people in the cloud computing community who are starting to discuss alternatives to the dreaded five nines concept and looking at ways that cloud-based infrastructures could be configured/deployed in a manner that is more proactive than reactive to disasters.
For about as long as there have been computer networks, administrators have attempted to keep these networks up and running. It seems to be a continuous battle between faulty hardware, poorly written software, unreliable connectivity and random acts of God. With the emergence of cloud computing we are now for the first time close to realizing a computing environment where we are able to focus less on keeping our applications up and more on making them run more efficiently and effectively.
In the case of a physical failure such as FlexiScale's recent one, the hardware downtime might be small, but the time to restore from a backup might be considerably longer. A minor cloud failure could cause a cascading series of software failures causing further application outage of hours or even days for those who depended on the availability of the given cloud. Meaning your cloud may achive five nines, but your application hosted on it doesn't.
Lately it seems there are a number of people in the cloud computing community who are starting to discuss alternatives to the dreaded five nines concept and looking at ways that cloud based infrastructures could be configured/deployed in a manner that is more proactive than reactive to disasters. There is a growing consensus that cloud-based disaster recovery may very well be the "killer app" for cloud computing. To achieve this, we need to start creating reference architectures and models that assume for failure. One that doesn't need to worry when the next disaster will happen next, just that it will happen and when it does, it's going to be business as usual.
In a recent conversation with Alan Gin founder of a super secret stealth firm called Zeronines, Alan described an interesting philosophy. He said the problem with most disaster recovery plans is the recovery is reactive, it is what happens after a disaster has already harmed your business. He said on its face, this is an unsound strategy. He went on to say; That current disaster recovery architectures, which uses the synonym “failover,” is based on the cutover archetype: a system’s primary component fails, damaging operations; then failover to a secondary component is attempted to resume operations. The problem with current cutover approaches is that it views unplanned downtime as inevitable, acceptable, and so requires that business halt.
I really liked this quote from an executive from EMC, a leading computer storage equipment firm, “current failover infrastructures are failures waiting to happen.”
To be competitive in today's always connected, always available world. We need to reinvent the fundamental idea of disaster recovery. One of the major benefits to using cloud computing is that you can make these types of failover assumptions well before they happen using an emerging global toolset of cloud components. It's not a matter of if, but a matter of when, when you take into consideration that application components will fail then you can build an application that features "failure as service". One that is always available, one with Zero Nines.
Published September 15, 2008 Reads 4,501
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Reuven Cohen
Reuven Cohen is Founder & CTO for Toronto based Enomaly Inc. - leading developer of Cloud Computing products and solutions focused on enterprise businesses. Enomaly's products include the Enomaly elastic computing platform, an open source cloud platform that enables a scalable enterprise IT and local cloud infrastructure platform. Cohen is a thought leader in the emerging cloud computing industry and maintains a blog at www.elasticvapor.com.
Reuven is also founder of several technology organizations;
Enomaly.com - Elastic Computing Platform (Cloud Computing),
Cloud Camp - Local Cloud Computing events,
the Unified Cloud Interface Project - Semantic Cloud Abstraction API
Cloud Interoperability Forum - Cloud Standards Group.
(twitter @ruv : Linkedin : RSS Feed)
- The Economics of Cloud Computing Analyzed
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Best Practices
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- Why SOA Needs Cloud Computing - Part 1
- The Cloud Transition: What Does It Mean For You?
- Cloud Computing Strategy
- IBM’s Mainframe Monopoly Threatened by BMC Founder’s Shop
- Economy Drives Adoption of Virtual Lab Technology
- Virtualization Expo Call for Papers Deadline December 15
- Oracle in Leader's Quadrant for Enterprise Application Servers
- Oracle Fusion Middleware Delivers World Record Single-Node Result
- The Economics of Cloud Computing Analyzed
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Best Practices
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- Citrix Aims To Cripple VMware’s Cloud Designs
- Product Evaluation: JBoss TCO Calculator
- Why SOA Needs Cloud Computing - Part 1
- Build Reliability into Cloud Computing for SMBs
- Perhaps SOA is More Strategy Than Architecture
- EC Wrong, Wrong, Wrong – and Sloppy to Boot: Intel
- Five Reasons to Choose a Private Cloud
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Configuring Eclipse for Remote Debugging a WebLogic Java Application
- Migrating a JBoss EJB Application to WebLogic
- XA Transactions
- The Top 250 Players in the Cloud Computing Ecosystem
- An Introduction to Abbot
- WebLogic Tutorial: "Integrating Apache Poi in WebLogic Server"
- Eclipse "Pollinate" Project to Integrate with Apache Beehive
- Failover and Recovery of Enterprise Applications - Part 1
- Cover Story: A Practical Solution to Internationalization of a J2EE Web App
- WebSphere vs WebLogic: IBM and BEA Spar Over SPEC Results































