| By GVB Subrahmanyam | Article Rating: |
|
| February 7, 2009 11:45 AM EST | Reads: |
1,565 |
Web Services have played a key role in integrating heterogeneous applications, particularly in cross domains. As part of identity management, Security Token Services are used for request and response tokens. However, we need multiple communication channels among Security Token Services when multiple applications in different domains try to reach other Web Services.
In this article we have proposed a Master Security Token Service (MSTS) that can act as a broker for all security authorization without duplicating the effort at every domain.
In a world of heterogeneous systems where each application is leveraging the services of other applications, a service-oriented analysis and design process has become significant. Web Services are sets of services used for integrating business processes and services, and can be accessed over the Internet or executed on a remote system hosting the Web Service requests using standard protocols. WS-Federation offers the
opportunity of fulfilling the SSO behavior across domains. Security information can be shared across the domains of applications through federated identity, which is about identity information across security domains. Heterogeneous applications will have interactions through either Web Service requests or browser requests. While Web Service requests follow the WS-Security and WS-Trust standards, browser requests follow on how the service messages are secured and encoded with Http messages to transport among the resources.
While Web Services use is now predominant in many enterprises across domains using different protocols, the security of the Web Services is debatable, consequently federated identity management implementation for the integrated environment of various applications across domains using Web Services has become a hot topic for the reference architectural framework.
Federated identity management should do authentication, authorization, auditing, reporting, and upstream and downstream session management. Security Token Service (STS) implements the protocol for message formats and message exchange patterns as defined in the WS-Trust specification and WS-Secure Conversation will allow multiple Security Token Service requests. The main challenge is how to federate identity and establish connection in domains when multiple applications are in different domains. We can have independent security authentication using separate Security Token Services for each of the applications and each of the services, which involves sets of repeated activities. To minimize the effort of using multiple Security Token Services, we've identified and proven the architecture, which will have one Security Token Services Server called a Master Security Token Services Server. This will reduce the replication of management credentials and provide robust security since it's a centrally monitored server.
Proposed MSTS Framework
Figure 1 shows a reference architecture for managing the security of Web Services in a heterogeneous enterprise environment. It's common for organizations to have multiple domains and for each domain to have a separate Security Token Service Server. It creates a lot of complexity if these systems have to interact with each other securely. In the context of Service Oriented Architecture, we use WS-Security and WS-Trust specifications to secure these services. These services will also make use of a Security Token Service from each realm/domain. This will also create a lot of complexity since every STS in one realm/domain has to issue tokens to STS in other domains. In the architecture proposed below, MSTS will reduce the complexity by having fewer communication channels.
This architecture recommends creating a Master STS that doesn't belong to any realm/domain in particular. This central STS has to maintain bindings to the other STS from all the realms/domains. Suppose, for example, that a client from domain 3 wants to call a service from domain 2. It can call the Master STS and get a token to make a call on STS 2. Then the client can call STS 2 and get a token to call the service from domain 2. Only the Master STS has to maintain a trust relationship with all the other realms/domains rather than the individual realms/domains. This way managing the STS will be easy since only the Master STS has to be changed if any realms/domains are added or deleted. The same architecture can be extended to external realms/domains. You can treat any external realm/domain as another domain.
Conclusion and Future Work
Implementing an MSTS will reduce STS complexity and simplify the overall architecture of the enterprise applications. It will help manage STS connections. Going forward, we're focused on identity management with WS-Federation and SAML2.0. We're also planning to work on the persistence of token services.
References
- Shankar_Kambhampaty
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webservice.
- Cesare Pautasso and Thomas Gschwind. Emerging Web Services Technology, Vol. II: Wewst 2007, Halle (Saale), Germany, November 2007. Selected Revised Papers; more by Cesare Pautasso and more by Thomas Gschwind.
- Gustavo Alonso, Fabio Casati, Harumi Kuno, and Vijay Machiraju. Web Services. Amazon.
- Klaus Aschenbrenner. Implement Secure .NET Web Services with WS-Security.
- Brokered Authentication: Security Token Service (STS)
- http://www4.java.no/javazone/2006/fossSOA-jan07(2).pdf.
- Web Services Seminar.
- Jason Baragry.
- Luciano Baresi, Elisabetta Di Nitto, Carlo Ghezzi, Sam Guinea. A framework for the deployment of adaptable web service compositions. 75-91.
- WS Federation.
- Federated Identity.
- How to: Create a Security Token Service.
- Web Service Security: Scenarios, Patterns, and Implementation Guidance for Web Services Enhancements (WSE) 3.0 Microsoft Corporation.
Published February 7, 2009 Reads 1,565
Copyright © 2009 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By GVB Subrahmanyam
As an Application Developer, Lead, Project Manager, and Development Manager and Delivery Manager in a wide variety of business applications as part of IT service provider, I am into delivery of solutions with most of the time with Banking/Finance domain/Supply Chain mgmt in the areas of Order to Cash, Procure to Pay, Inventory management, Structured products of financial systems, Post equity settlement and financial derivative confirmations. Major focus areas are Development, Delivery and Sustenance of IT Applications in Supply Chain/Insurance/Banking/Finance. Albeit most of my projects are Java based assignments, I am technology agnostic. In the current role, I am working as solution provider for Commercial Healthcare, Insurance, banking and Financial systems. I am also PMI Volunteer for OPM3 standard as this will help to understand latest process standards being adopted by PMI. Well, I have M.Tech. and Ph.D. from IIT Kharagpur in the area of Chemical Technology, India and MS in Software Systems from BITS Pilani. I am also PMI certified PMP. It is interesting that I have gone through one year program of Executive Program in Business Management from IIM Calcutta which has given me in sight into some of the management fundamentals and understanding concepts.
- The Economics of Cloud Computing Analyzed
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Best Practices
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- Why SOA Needs Cloud Computing - Part 1
- The Cloud Transition: What Does It Mean For You?
- Cloud Computing Strategy
- IBM’s Mainframe Monopoly Threatened by BMC Founder’s Shop
- Economy Drives Adoption of Virtual Lab Technology
- Virtualization Expo Call for Papers Deadline December 15
- Oracle in Leader's Quadrant for Enterprise Application Servers
- Oracle Fusion Middleware Delivers World Record Single-Node Result
- The Economics of Cloud Computing Analyzed
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Best Practices
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- Citrix Aims To Cripple VMware’s Cloud Designs
- Product Evaluation: JBoss TCO Calculator
- Why SOA Needs Cloud Computing - Part 1
- Build Reliability into Cloud Computing for SMBs
- Perhaps SOA is More Strategy Than Architecture
- EC Wrong, Wrong, Wrong – and Sloppy to Boot: Intel
- Five Reasons to Choose a Private Cloud
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Configuring Eclipse for Remote Debugging a WebLogic Java Application
- Migrating a JBoss EJB Application to WebLogic
- XA Transactions
- The Top 250 Players in the Cloud Computing Ecosystem
- An Introduction to Abbot
- WebLogic Tutorial: "Integrating Apache Poi in WebLogic Server"
- Eclipse "Pollinate" Project to Integrate with Apache Beehive
- Failover and Recovery of Enterprise Applications - Part 1
- Cover Story: A Practical Solution to Internationalization of a J2EE Web App
- WebSphere vs WebLogic: IBM and BEA Spar Over SPEC Results































