| By Roger Strukhoff | Article Rating: |
|
| March 7, 2009 07:42 PM EST | Reads: |
2,332 |
This article originally appeared in NOW Magazine, which retains all rights.
“Imagine all assets being a portfolio of innovation,” says a software executive interviewed recently by NOW Magazine. This includes legacy assets, and yes, this includes legacy mainframe assets. Not the “hairball” of Sun Chairman Scott McNealy’s piquant description, mainframes instead should be viewed as potential repositories of “gems and jewels,” according to this exec, who points out that “innovation doesn’t have to sit in one area.”
It’s clear that regardless of the innovation game, SOA is a required strategy based on the need to reduce IT expenses through massive re-use and flexibility. As companies realize the role SOA can play in completely rebalancing the maintainance-to-innovation spend, the demand for “service-orienting” everything should take off, by this reasoning. The potential for exponential growth in services will lead to new complexities and challenges, of course. So then the question becomes, how will these services be developed into composite applications, deployed, managed and governed?
End-users, after all, whether employees, partners, or customers, don’t get their groove on, at least these days, by mastering the intricacies of siloed, specific application environments. It’s what those apps can do—the services they can provide—that rock users’ worlds today.
Service virtualization rocks IT managers’ worlds as well. When services become pervasive, how are you going to manage them? How do you deploy, then govern them? This is where SOA boldly steps in. Repeating the mantra that SOA is not a product, you can’t buy a SOA, it is imperative to realize that you can build one.
This is where virtualization escapes the confines of buzzwordism and enters the realm of the practical. When assets are pulled out—decoupled, liberated, decomposed, whatever term you wish to use—of legacy systems and integrated into new, composite applications, web services, or nascent SOAs, they must be virtualized, and here is where the concept of “service virtualization” gains traction.
We’ve been down the virtualization road before, quite recently, in fact. With hardware and applications becoming increasingly pervasive, so grew the challenge to effectively use these assets, and virtualization blossomed. People familiar with age-old concepts such as virtual memory and virtualized storage suddenly needed to wrap their minds around the virtualization of hardware platforms (not just the storage subsystems) and the software that resided on these systems.
Once down this virtual path, it requires only a minor leap of faith to envision service virtualization. As applications become virtualized, it becomes clear that the value of those apps lies within the services they deliver. So those services must be pried out, then integrated into the new, virtualized environment.
We’re All Architects Today
Without getting hung up on the role of the architect, it is clear—paraphrasing Richard Nixon’s comment about Keynesian economics--that we are all architects today. That is, all members of the IT department as well as business-line managers must think conceptually—think innovatively—about their IT assets, infrastructure, and what it should be doing for the business.
SOA can serve as the secret sauce in letting your company start to turn your innovation spend inside out, to start to reverse that seemingly intransigent 80/20 ratio. “Don’t look at existing assets as closed assets,” says one software executive. “Leverage them to start to reverse 80/20.”
Innovative services are created and deployed by thinking in this new, open way. The innovation may lie in creating a new interface that lets users access numerous applications while they are completing what looks to them like a single process. The innovation may lie in faster performance that allows a new feature or two (perhaps a quick survey or bonus offer) to be added to the process. Or the innovation may lie in the creation of an entirely new experience—a community-oriented asset-sharing service, for example—that nevertheless leverages something as wizened as a long-existing relational database.
NOW Magazine bills its focus as “Enterprise Architecture Principles and Practices.” Best practices typically form the core of the ubiquitous Centers of Excellence that one finds at major technology provisioners and buyers throughout the world today. But why not turn those Centers of Excellence into Centers of Innovation? In fact, “practices” today can also refer to “next practices,” and core to innovation is the concept of identifying next practices, making them operational, setting them up as best practices, then moving on in a constant innovation loop.
Many universities have developed such centers, as have various entrepreneurial incubator-type organizations. But this brings back to the nature and definition of innovation. Rather than seeking to build that better mousetrap, a corporate Center of Innovation can focus on those Best Practices that understand all IT assets as gems and jewels, and work to reverse the ratio in ways that don’t reflect a zero-sum game mentality. Are you up to this challenge? Have you already risen to it?
Follow the author at www.twitter.com/strukhoff or www.nowmagazineblog.blogspot.com
Published March 7, 2009 Reads 2,332
Copyright © 2009 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Roger Strukhoff
Roger Strukhoff earned a BA with honors from Knox College, a Certificate in Technical Communications from UC-Berkeley, and an MBA from CSU-East Bay. His work recently won a "Stevie" American Business Award as best publication in its category. His volunteer work in international affairs merited a Letter of Commendation from the Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard. He splits most of his time between Silicon Valley and Southeast Asia, but can also be found at www.twitter.com/strukhoff
- The Economics of Cloud Computing Analyzed
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Best Practices
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- Why SOA Needs Cloud Computing - Part 1
- The Cloud Transition: What Does It Mean For You?
- Cloud Computing Strategy
- IBM’s Mainframe Monopoly Threatened by BMC Founder’s Shop
- Economy Drives Adoption of Virtual Lab Technology
- Virtualization Expo Call for Papers Deadline December 15
- Oracle in Leader's Quadrant for Enterprise Application Servers
- Oracle Fusion Middleware Delivers World Record Single-Node Result
- The Economics of Cloud Computing Analyzed
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Best Practices
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- Citrix Aims To Cripple VMware’s Cloud Designs
- Product Evaluation: JBoss TCO Calculator
- Why SOA Needs Cloud Computing - Part 1
- Build Reliability into Cloud Computing for SMBs
- Perhaps SOA is More Strategy Than Architecture
- EC Wrong, Wrong, Wrong – and Sloppy to Boot: Intel
- Five Reasons to Choose a Private Cloud
- Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Configuring Eclipse for Remote Debugging a WebLogic Java Application
- Migrating a JBoss EJB Application to WebLogic
- XA Transactions
- The Top 250 Players in the Cloud Computing Ecosystem
- An Introduction to Abbot
- WebLogic Tutorial: "Integrating Apache Poi in WebLogic Server"
- Eclipse "Pollinate" Project to Integrate with Apache Beehive
- Failover and Recovery of Enterprise Applications - Part 1
- Cover Story: A Practical Solution to Internationalization of a J2EE Web App
- WebSphere vs WebLogic: IBM and BEA Spar Over SPEC Results



































